
- Jake Fromm/Daily
- University President Mary Sue Coleman and Vice President for Student Affairs E. Royster Harper host a fireside chat with students in the Kuenzel Room of the Michigan Union on Tuesday, April 13. Topics discussed include the smoking ban, north campus, and accomodations for students with disabilities. Buy this photo
BY JOSEPH LICHTERMAN
Daily Staff Reporter
Published April 13, 2010
In a small group meeting with students yesterday, University President Mary Sue Coleman addressed a number of concerns raised by those assembled, including issues regarding students with disabilities on campus and the University’s Smoke Free Initiative.
More like this
At the fireside chat — a monthly meeting with invited students held by Coleman and University Vice President for Student Affairs Royster Harper — students voiced concern with how the University handles issues relating to students with disabilities.
Rackham student Katie Pethan suggested that the University should take a more proactive approach in reaching out to students with disabilities. Pethan said some departments are better than others at assisting students with disabilities, but she would like to see more action taken throughout the University.
Pethan said it’s often difficult for incoming graduate and undergraduate students to know what resources are actually available to them. However, she acknowledged that in order for the University to offer any help, disabled students need to inform the University of their disability.
“I would like to open the discussion about how to create a proactive, perhaps an orientation, for students who self identify after they’ve been admitted,” Pethan said in an interview after the event.
In response to Pethan’s concerns, Harper said the University needs to remove the stigma in students’ minds about identifying themselves as disabled, adding that the University’s system for making accommodations for students with disabilities requires students who identify as disabled to “step forward.”
“If you come, you can get it,” Harper said. “We need to figure out how it occurs before because sometimes what happens is that students don’t want to put (their disability) on their application material. There’s such a fear that there’s going to be negative consequences to it, so people are silent. Then it makes it difficult to do the proactive piece.”
LSA sophomore Sarah Rabinowe, meanwhile, discussed the difficulties students with learning disabilities face if they want to apply for classes that would serve as a substitute for the LSA foreign language requirement.
All LSA students are required to take four semesters of a foreign language. However, if students show documentation that they have “extreme difficulty” learning a language, and if students receive a score on the Michigan Language Aptitude Test that shows they have a language learning disability, they may petition the University’s Academic Standards Board for a language substitution.
In an e-mail interview after the fireside chat, Rabinowe wrote that there needs to be more involvement from the University’s Services for Students with Disabilities office in the process of obtaining a language substitution.
"The issue is that there's a failure model set up where there is a waiver process that goes through the Foreign Language Waiver Committee (FLW), a subcommittee of the LSA Academic Standards Board," she wrote. "It's done through the advising department, rather than the disability department and only one person from the disability department is on the committee."
She added that the Academic Standards Board has requirements that she says are impossible to meet. Rabinowe said the board often questions the legitimacy of a student’s disability or says that the language a student is taking is merely too difficult for him or her and that he or she should try another one.
“You have to try, that’s fair enough, a foreign language before you can apply for your waiver,” she said. “The problem is, they often require that you try, withdraw, fail (and) show you can’t succeed in more than one language.”
By the time students complete the process of obtaining a language substitution, their grade point average and other academic standards have suffered, Rabinowe said.






















